Page 4 of 6
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:31 pm
by firebird33
How about the Nanchang CJ-6A? I have a friend who owns one. I haven't seen on for FSX ever.
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:43 pm
by Busterbvi
I'm still pushing for the Phantom F4, its got " Winner " written all over it !
I see Milviz is releasing yet another freakin 737, yey !! thats how many out there now !?
What a waste of talent and time, its been done to death guys !!
I like your thoughts on the Vulcan Colin, go for it.
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:18 am
by Mudhen
Busterbvi wrote:I'm still pushing for the Phantom F4, its got " Winner " written all over it !
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 2:35 pm
by miragecy
Mudhen wrote:Busterbvi wrote:I'm still pushing for the Phantom F4, its got " Winner " written all over it !
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:16 pm
by Krazycolin
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:25 pm
by miragecy
Why not you as well? There is room for a lot of F4s
Andy
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:33 pm
by Busterbvi
Hmmmmmm. Very interesting, looks good too !!
Thanks for the heads up Colin.
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:55 pm
by Busterbvi
Anyone seen this ? My prayers are being anwered, very exiting !
A Phantom F4 and a Tornado GR4.
https://metal2mesh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=48
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 4:04 pm
by Mudhen
miragecy wrote:Why not you as well? There is room for a lot of F4s...
I agree.
I began using FSX and your T-38 in august this year. Since then I’ve purchased about a dozen or so third party models for FSX. With the exception of your F-86 and the Lotus L-39, I have removed or no longer fly any of the other pay ware airplanes. The reason is simple. Other models, in my view, can’t compare. While real life Talon IP’s may see compromise and lack in the T-38, I see exceptional work when compared to other models. My point is this – I have a jaundiced eye when viewing other developer’s work. That’s not to say they don’t work hard to bring about a product, I just don’t think they work hard enough and persevere to bring about the best that can be had. Milviz does.
I think a Milviz F-4 would be the “bee’s knees.”
lates...
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:41 pm
by Mudhen
Mudhen wrote:I think a Milviz F-4 would be the “bee’s knees.”
Come to think of it...so would an F-105. Imagine that with VR's tacpack.
Mud
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2013 8:42 am
by Zetarra
Mudhen wrote:Mudhen wrote:I think a Milviz F-4 would be the “bee’s knees.”
Come to think of it...so would an F-105. Imagine that with VR's tacpack.
Mud
Indeed. We're in desperate need of a good 105.
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:04 pm
by GroovyMotion
TKDAdam23 wrote:One trainer i've always wanted to see was the CL-41/CT-114!
Me too!
And also the CF-101 Voodoo
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2014 12:20 am
by SirStiggie
How about a proper TBM850 with the PL-21? I know Carenado has one but its really only a pretty face with no substance. I know the real TBM has the G1000 but I would overlook that if it means Navigraph support and I can fly SID/STAR's.
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:49 am
by Mike05
I know Eaglesoft has a Citation X but there attention to detail isn't that great, would MILVIZ be willing to toss the idea around for one?
Re: NEW MODELS REQUEST
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:34 pm
by marvic
A lot of talk about a DASH7. Steam gauges and a great plane. I can see Milviz all over that.